Tuesday, May 12, 2020
Essay Human Rights Violations in the War on Terrorism
Following the September 11th terrorist attacks in which at least 3,000 people were killed, the United States has pursued policies that violate human rights in order to wage the war on terrorism. These policies include the adoption of new security measures, the poor treatment of captured fighters at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, and the willingness of the Bush administration to overlook human rights violations in other countries in return for their support in the war on terrorism. When the enemy is faceless, as it is in the United States fight against terror, there is a tendency to violate human rights in order to identify the perpetrators and anticipate further atrocities. Violations include detaining suspects withoutâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦From a democratic standpoint, these actions cannot be considered just or moral. In addition to new security legislation, the United States also defies human rights standards through the treatment and legal status given to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners being held at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba. According to the Geneva Convention (1949), in which the United States is a party, a captured fighter is considered a prisoner of war if they are members of an adversary states armed forces or are part of an identifiable military group that abides by the laws of war. Since most members of Al- Qaeda did not wear insignia or abide by the laws of war, they would probably not qualify as prisoners of war. However, Taliban soldiers comprised the armed forces of Afghanistan and should be entitled to POW status (http://www.hrw.org). While the Bush administration decided that the Geneva Convention will apply to Taliban prisoners, it said that none of the detainees will be legally treated as prisoners of war, meaning there will be no effective change in their treatment or status. John Godfrey, a Toronto Liberal MP, claimed that the Bush administrations interpretation was flat-out wrong --on the one hand they respect the Geneva Convention and claim that there is a distinction between Taliban and Al-Qaeda, but they continue to treat both of them as non-prisoners of war. That doesnt follow. If you respect the Geneva Convention, then you have to treat at least one ofShow MoreRelatedEssay on Human Rights, War and Terrorism1226 Words à |à 5 PagesHuman Rights, War and Terrorism After every war come the peace talks; after millions of people had been killed. After the terrorist attacks comes the investigation, reason, or counter-terrorism; after lives had been wasted. There is time for the nations of the world to come together to understand one another in order to avoid war and terrorism and that time is now. War is as old as man. It is a reign of terror when people are always on the run, always hungry, alwaysRead MoreA Global Perspective Of Beat Terrorism1420 Words à |à 6 PagesHow to use a Global Perspective to beat Terrorism On July 14th, 2016, France suffered a devastating terrorist attack as a truck driver targeted his vehicle against the citizens of Nice, killing more than 50 people and injuring several more. Although 2016 has not ended, the world has suffered more terrorist attacks this year than any other year in history (Dorell). The group spearheading terrorist attacks in recent years is the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, a radical Sunni Muslim organizationRead MoreFighting Terrorism without Infringing on Human Rights Essay826 Words à |à 4 Pagesfight terrorism without infringing upon human rights. Prominent advocate for this assumption is obviously Mary Robinson, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, who urged states to ââ¬Å"adhere to their international obligations to uphold human rights and fundamental freedoms when conducting counterterrorismâ⬠. This has become a key component of UN-endorsed Global Counterterrorism strategy. Another key leader, supporter of this assumption former US President Jimmy Carter in his remarks on Human RightsRead MoreRelevance Of Sovereignty And The Threat Of Terrorism Essay1482 Words à |à 6 Pagesexpanding necessity of humanitarian intervention along with eliminating the threat of terrorism. Sovereignty, as defined in the Westphalian sense, is only useful today in international politics to the extent that states still require justification for their interventions, heavily varying from the idea of state supremacy within its borders. Globalization alongside intricate international affairs, such as terrorism and humanitarian intervention , largely influence current sovereignty norms. ConventionalRead MoreWar in Iraq Essay1159 Words à |à 5 Pagesgovernment has said that it is to fight terrorism or to bring democracy to the Middle Eastern nations. There happens to be a barrier that stands in the way of both those goals and that would be Islamic Fundamentalism. Islamic Fundamentalism is the term used to describe the religious ideologies of advocating a return to the ââ¬Å"fundamentalsâ⬠of Islam. Through this return to the Islamic fundamentals, the rights of women have been violated while acts of terrorism and suicides increase. Also, there has beenRead MoreInternational Terrorism - the Worlds Greatest Challenge Today?680 Words à |à 3 PagesInternational Terrorism ââ¬â The Worldââ¬â¢s Greatest Challenge Today Today the threat of terrorism is becoming more and more serious. Terrorism is considered the greatest threat against the safety of the world, and especially the USA, today. The extent of the terrorism has increased significantly over the last couple of years, since the terrorist attacks against the US on the 11th of September 2001. After these attacks former president of the US, George Bush declared a war against terrorism. There areRead MoreFight Terrorism without Infringing Human Rights Essay716 Words à |à 3 PagesThe fight against terrorism has always raised concerns that the methods used by States may infringe human rights. As one leading academic, Professor Martin Scheinin,[1] has said ââ¬Å"Governments have often felt tempted to depart from â⬠¦ the fundamental rights of the individual when confronted with acts of terrorismâ⬠¦.â⬠[2] Many leading world figures have stated that the fight against terrorism can be conducted without infringing human rights. For example, Ban Ki Moon, the Secretary General of the UnitedRead MoreEssay about Homeland Security1415 Words à |à 6 PagesSince 9/11, terrorism has become a priority for law enforcement and military personnel in the United States. Even more importantly, it has turned into a War on Terrorism. September 11th was the worst terrorist attack ever on the United States. Therefore, our government officials responded in the only way that felt suitable, attacking terrorism. The group responsible for the events of 9/11 is called the Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda is one of the most well known terrorist groups in the world. BecauseRead MoreU.s. National Security Strategy1382 Words à |à 6 Pages The Way Ahead for American and Iranian Relations: Engaging in a Cold War Over the past 37 years, Iran has become one of the most complex and stubborn national security strategy issues that the United States has had to deal with. Once a key U.S. ally in the region, Iran is now a chief protagonist. To complicate matters, recently, the U.S. has found itself simultaneously an adversary and a quasi-ally of Iran. An example of this duality would be: on one hand, Iran has provided support to terroristRead MoreThe War On Terror : Do The Rules Need For Change?3040 Words à |à 13 PagesThe War on Terror: Do the Rules Need to Change? Terrorism has been in existence for many decades. Most recently, the events of September 11th, 2001 have sparked discussions and controversies on the issue of the war on terror. Many nationââ¬â¢s and organizationââ¬â¢s have different definitions of terrorism, what laws should be used when dealing with terrorism, and whether or not it is time to rethink the rules of the war on terror. Twelve years after the attacks of 9/11 I believe it is time to reconsider
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.